Cases of the End of Parliamentary Interrogation in the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the Year 2005 (Comparative Study)
Abstract
AI Key Takeaways & Findings
AI SynthesisSynthesized key insights and empirical takeaways extracted from this peer-reviewed manuscript:
- 1 In the interim period, ie the period between the submission of the motion and discussed in the parliament, challenged opposed held its impact on the events, and ends pursued procedural.
- 2 Shall be transferred without reaching its destination and this casual but that leads to recover or fall.
- 3 Perhaps it is worth mentioning that the rules governing these exhibitors representing the general rules applicable to other means of media and parliamentary control on the work of the government or one of its members Calcaal Parliamentary with minor variations required by the subjective nature.
How to Cite & Export Metadata
Full-Text & Galley Reader
Pilih format pembaca interaktif yang optimal untuk perangkat Anda.
Machine-Readable Indexing Metadata (Dublin Core) ↓
This page represents an archival record of the peer-reviewed manuscript published by Indonesian Journal Publisher. ActaNova provides permanent digital preservation and global open metadata accessibility. Copyright of the manuscript remains with the original authors or publisher in accordance with their designated license.
Full-Text & Access
Download PDF (with cover stamp) Read at Primary Journal Portal Official Journal Home Internet Archive Wayback ↗Indexing Readiness Status
OpenAlex Global Metrics
Bibliographic GraphPublication Details